Skip to main content
In EnglishMusic

Zero7 & YouTube & Copyrights

By September 27, 2006No Comments

This just tells so well how different points of view artists and major labels can have towards copyright.

Zero7 just told on their MySpace page that they’ve registered to YouTube and have some of their music videos online. They are asking people to post their recordings from Zero7’s gigs, some covers and maybe cover music videos, too:

“For those of you who might not know, Zero 7 have their own YouTube page.
You can watch the band’s videos on there and if you upload your own Zero 7 videos onto YouTube, then it could appear on the page.
They could be videos you’ve recorded at gigs, or even your own cover versions!”

I wonder what Universal, Sony BMG and other major labels would say about that. At the moment Universal is telling that YouTube owns them millions of dollars due to these kinds of copyright infringements.
I think any artist would consider a possibility to see their music videos on the Internet for free as a very good and very cheap promotion and not as a baad, bääd copyright infringement.

This goes back to Finnish copyright laws, too. As I’ve earlier told, it’s basically illegal to rip your own vinyls to CDRs and play them on gigs. I wonder how many electronic music artists would really deny a possibility to rip their old records which aren’t available as MP3s and bring them to life again.

It might be it’s because I’m not a recording artist, but I really do not see any good in the way big copyright companies are working – from the marginal music style’s point of view, at least.
Killing a possibility to define your own ways of promotion does not do any good for the record and copyright companies – it just harms the artist. And I want to believe they are going to find it out when it’s too late. That would do good for them.

No Comments

  • thanks a lot for this comment, juska!
    since the existance of internet, the music market has been shifting constantly, and laws have been struggling to keep up with this development.
    “copyrights” are a big question mark… it is a territory which needs to be re-defined.

    -considering that all copyrighted material needs to stay within a label and asked for permission to be showed to the public, hence, the internet, most of myspace must be “illegal”, then…?!?!?!?!?!?!

    -youtube… “illegal”..?!?!?!?!

    -forums with dj mixes… “illegal”.. ?!?!?!?!

    terveisin
    sacha

Leave a Reply